Article 302 (b) of the perverts of the house at night, assuming that the deceased was executed in his own home at night, at night, in the relevant time of the house The presence of eyewitnesses was natural, but the question was whether they were in the position to identify the accused ten months after the identification parade took place, and as soon as they opened the door, armed with pistols. Strangers get there, shoot, and destroy bullets. On winter nights and even if there was a tube light, eyewitnesses had very limited time to look at the assailants, which they had witnessed for the first time in their lives. 9 days after the identification parade was held. In this case both the accused were included in the identification parade simultaneously against the rule of law and the details of the dummies kept for each accused at the time of identification were not given by their e-magistrate in their report. During the parade, the prosecution's witnesses damaged the identity of the two accused by assigning them no role, and two rows of individuals, including the two accused, were made by the jail authorities, not the magistrate himself. , There was a procedure flaw in conducting the identification parade, which made the identity authenticity doubtful; the objections raised by the defendants at the time of the confession of the identity parade were not recorded by the magistrate ocular testimony, Our suspects were not able to be admitted. Multiple procedures and factual errors in the identity parade