S42 Law Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 115 of the title of tenant land in question number was owned by the local government, and the defendants had constructed shops on it with the permission of the authorities while the plaintiffs were accused. He had it as a tenant. The plaintiff, who stopped paying rent to the plaintiffs and denied their title, was sued by the plaintiffs by the trial court in their favor, and only the appeals filed by the defendants were allowed and reviewed. The High Court was dismissed for use in the jurisdiction which restored the judgment and order. The Plaintiff presented by the trial court to the defendants was that in the presence of the original owner of the property, the provisions of Article 115 provision of Law Sha55, Law Sha 19845 were not enforceable, against the tenant to challenge the landlord. The legality was legislated, the trial reached through the trial court. With regard to the title of the case property, the decision was taken against the authorities who did not challenge the judgment and order of the trial court. Threatened to be evicted Generally, the tenant was not entitled to the title of a third person, there was nothing to show that this law was made under section 115, which is evidence of law, Was created under Article 115 of 1984. Was removed because such defendants could not challenge the title of the plaintiffs, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision and the order passed by the High Court of Appeals
