Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 420/467/468/471/409/109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Fraud, Fraud, Forgery as a forged document, use as a forged document, criminal breach of trust, instability and criminal misconduct guarantee, denial of co-accused, doctor receiving any cash from hospital after leaving hospital contract work. But the accused, the Assistant Accounts Officer of the hospital, first paid the co-accused after preparing the salary slip, knowing full well that he was now in the hospital. I was not paying my obligations, the fact was mentioned in the FIR, who was the participant of the inquiry report, the accused (the doctor), was released on bail after the refund, the accused was found to be contrary to the facts. The matter, the principle of consistency was not applied and in this case the higher courts cannot be read with section 498, CR under section 497. The PC had the right to form an independent opinion in relation to the involvement of an accused, despite the fact that the participant was released on bail from one of the accused, on the basis of which the accused's action in preparing the document was based on the salary slip. The salary was prepared. The accused, the prime mover, seemed more serious than the prosecution of anyone who received the money. The dispute is that the accused is not sustainable in regulating all three of the allegedly ineligible, because he did not have the authority to be an Assistant Accounts Officer. Although understandable, this cannot be considered at the bail-out stage, because the bail-out phase
