Find a Lawyer

PLATINUM INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (INSURANCE)

Sections 41 and 158 of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLI of 1997), the section 33 insurance company re-establishing a renegotiation of the insurance contract with the fraudulent insurance corporation and applying for a fine appeal during the inspection of the insurance books, It was impressed that the company maintained its insurance contract with the insurance corporation under which there was no office. The appellant company was not prosecuted and the appellant was fined Rs. 1 lakh illegally. The insurance corporation said. And also said that the corporation appellant also forged false insurance documents in violation of section 158 of the appellant's insurance ordinance 2000, which in these circumstances was partly fined, one of the insurance arrangements. Was. In the absence of insurance company registration requirements and such management, no insurance company will be allowed to work.

Related judgments — Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan, 2010

• TAKAFUL PAKISTAN LTD. v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (INSURANCE) 2010 CLD 1228
• Mrs. BUSHRA EHSAN v. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 2010 CLD 1234
• KHALID SURAJ BAJWA v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (CLD) 2010 CLD 1237
• ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY LTD. v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ENFORCEMENT) 2010 CLD 1240
• SHEHRYAR SAEED v. DIRECTOR (ENFORCEMENT) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2010 CLD 1268
• KASB SECURITIES (PVT.) LTD. 2010 CLD 1519
• MUHAMMAD M. ISMAIL, CHAIRMAN v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ENFORCEMENT) 2010 CLD 1690
• M.A. JAMEEL v. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ENFORCEMENT) 2010 CLD 1716

All Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan judgments of 2010 →

lawer from fb area from Kot Addu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes