Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

WORKERS\' UNION TOWN COMMITTEE, SANGLA HILL. versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 8 (3) Registration of Trade Unions Appeal to Labor Court Appointed to a fixed term shall be filed within a reasonable time The union workers are illiterate Do not know what to do after the refusal of the Registrar. After filing an appeal about the union's registration for 10 months on the advice of an Advocate Appeal, in the circumstances, get entertained

1976 P L C 115

[Labour Court Punjab]

Present: Rai Abdur Razzaque Khan, Presiding Officer

WORKERS' UNION TOWN COMMITTEE, SANGLA HILL.

Versus

REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE

Appeal No. 294 of 1974, decided on 22nd November 1974.

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---

-- S. 8 (3)-Registration of Trade Union-Appeal to Labour Court- No time limit prescribed-Appeal to be filed within reasonable time- Workers of Union being uneducated not knowing what to do after refusal of Registrar to register their Union filing appeal after about 10 months on advice of Advocate-Appeal, in circumstances, entertained.

(b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---

Ss. 2 (xiv) & 3 (a)-Municipal Committee-Corporate body-An undertaking for welfare of society - Falls within definition of "industry"-Employees of Municipal committee, held, entitled to form Union to be registered.

This is an appeal under section 8 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance preferred against refusal of the Registrar Trade Unions, Lahore Region, Lahore to register the appellant-Union of Town Committee Sangla Hill.

Learned representative of the Registrar has raised a preliminary objection that appeal is hopelessly time-barred. Refusal was conveyed to the appellant-Union on 30th November 1973, and now it is after about 10 months that they have come in appeal. No doubt that this appeal should have been filed by the appellant in a reasonable time but learned representative has filed to show provision regarding limitation in this respect. Representative of the Union has stated that this is a Union of washermen and Sweepers who are un-educated and did not know what to A do after the refusal when I came into contact with them and told that they file an appeal only then they have come to know that an appeal could be filed against that refusal.

Learned representative of Registrar states that all these employees fall under the definition of public servant but be has failed to show any pro vision regarding the status of the employee of a Municipal Committee. They are employees of a corporated body that is an undertaking for the welfare of the society and therefore very much fall within the definition of industry under the Industrial Relations Ordinance. The Registrar is B therefore directed to register this Union. The appellant-Union is directed to file a fresh application for the registration of the Union.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates FR Kohat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.