DG EPA versus WALID JUNAID STEEL MILLS, SHEIKHUPURA
Sections 11, 16, 21 and 22 were excluded because of a complaint for violating an environmental protection order that resulted in the burning of residual smoke. No device was installed by the unit to control air pollution An environmental protection order was issued in which the unit was instructed to adopt therapeutic approaches and was presented by the respondent's lawyer and stated that The unit was closed and not operational. The plaintiff was instructed to take action to confirm the statement of the inspection report lawyer who stated that the unit was not working because its main gate was closed, and that the owner / unit was bank and the WAPDA defaulter unit was closed, but The crime has been reported, it has been committed in the past, which may not have been done under section 11 of the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act of 1997, only to stop the respondent from being a crime victim, Accordingly, an arrest warrant / non-bailable arrest warrant should be sought according to the law.
Related judgments — Environmental Tribunal Lahore, 2011
