Environmental Tribunal Lahore — Judgments of 2011

17 reported judgments of the Environmental Tribunal Lahore from 2011.

• DG EPA v. QASIM GLASS BOTTLES 2011 CLD 1024

  Sections 11, 16 and 17 violate the Environmental Protection Order The respondents / accused were mistreated before the Tribunal several times that they adopted medical treatment and were ordered by th…

• DG EPA v. TELENOR COMPANY, GHARIB SHAH 2011 CLD 1067

  Violations of Environmental Protection Orders 16, 17, 18, 20 and 21 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 205, 353 and 540 Applicants' personal attendance by transfer to the accused with person…

• DG EPA v. ABDUL HAMEED POULTRY FARM 2011 CLD 1103

  Investigations of sections 11, 16 and 21 of the complaint case revealed that the poultry waste was found burning and bursting open. And since there was only one solid waste storage room on the poultry…

• DG EPA v. WI-TRIBE, LAHORE 2011 CLD 1138

  Sections 11, 12, 13, 16, 17 and 21 Environmental Tribunal Rules, 1999, R13 Prohibition of certain exclusions or emissions violations of environmental protection order, application of party, applicatio…

• DG EPA v. Syed MAQSOOD ALI SHAH POULTRY FARM 2011 CLD 1155

  Sections 11, 16 and 21 of the Environmental Protection Order, the response to the complaint, was filed by the Environmental Protection Agency against the respondent by its owner who submitted and file…

• DG EPA v. WALID JUNAID STEEL MILLS, SHEIKHUPURA 2011 CLD 1168

  Sections 11, 16, 21 and 22 were excluded because of a complaint for violating an environmental protection order that resulted in the burning of residual smoke. No device was installed by the unit to c…

• SARDAR FAKHAR IMAM v. TAJ PAPER MILLS 2011 CLD 1179

  R 21 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Chapter VI [Section to To] 93] Procedure for the relevant provisions for the execution of proceedings under the Code of Criminal Code, from Section 68 to the i…

• Mian MUHAMMAD IMRAN v. PARAMOUNT ENGINEERING WORKS 2011 CLD 1189

  Authorization to examine the defendant's statement under Section 11, 12, 13, 16 and 17 Criminal Code of Conduct (V 1898), section 342 violation of certain exclusion or emission prohibition environment…

• DG EPA v. GULZAREEN POULTRY FARM 2011 CLD 1209

  Sections 11, 16 and 21 of the respondents stated that the soaking pit and burial pit had already been provided by the owner of the poultry farm when it was handled by the complainant's department repr…

• DG EPA v. HAFEEZ STEEL MILLS 2011 CLD 1220

  Section 11, 16, 17 and 21 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 265D Complaint Causes Pollution Complaint filed against defendant due to non-compliant pollution of procedure was accepted and 50 …

• RAHEEL MAJEED v. DG EPA 2011 CLD 1232

  Factories that operate without obtaining environmental clearances of sections 11, 12, 16, 17 and 21 have complained that factories are operating without obtaining environmental clearance, which was re…

• PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATION, SANGLA HILL v. DG EPA 2011 CLD 1280

  Sections 12, 16, 21 and 22 of the area where the diesel generator was causing severe vibration and noise pollution in the residential area were issued an Environmental Protection Order to the applican…

• LAFARGE PAKISTAN CEMENT COMPANY LTD. v. DG EPA 2011 CLD 1295

  Complaints of Sections 12, 16, 17 and 21 against the construction of the pollution plant under the Environmental Protection Order Appeal against the Appellant Company The legal status and legality of …

• DG EPA v. MULTAN INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MULTAN 2011 CLD 1325

  Sections 11, 16 and 21 produce environmental pollution due to the clear and unacceptable disposal of wastewater. The inspector submitted a site inspection report that the environmental pollution relat…

• D.G. KHAN CEMENT COMPANY LTD. v. EPA, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 CLD 1351

  Sections 11, 12, 16, 17 and 21 Appellant Company challenged the appropriateness and legality of the Environmental Protection Order passed by the Agency under Section 16 of the Pakistan Environmental P…

• ZIA ULLAH v. DG EPA 2011 CLD 1360

  Sections 11, 12, 16, 17 and 21 did not provide the 30-day mandatory notice to the Environment Agency on the environmental agency as required by Section 21 (3) (b) of the Pakistan Environmental Protect…

• DG EPA v. SHAHEEN FOUNDRY, OKARA 2011 CLD 1373

  Sections 11, 12, 16, 17 and 21 appeal to the Company Appeal Company, directing the company / unit order to regulate environmental issues under noise and smoke complaints at high levels of organic solv…

Other years — Environmental Tribunal Lahore

2013 · 2011

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.