SHABBIR AHMAD SUMRA versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 170 and 171 Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Circular No. 15 of CBR Refunded from Services under the Golden Handshake Scheme on 6 April 1997 The excuse for restitution, claiming a return to the assessment record reduction was not taken by the department on the basis that the return and other records were not available and it was concluded that the complainant did not file a return, The complainant complained to the relevant authorities several times after the announcement of the Supreme Court's decision to enforce and consequently pay. Due to a refund and payment but no response was received. If a document was needed by the department to dispose of a refund claim, the complainant should have issued a notice and demanded it formally, no notice was issued, and the department could not Wanted to be delayed. Dealing with Complainant's Review Record Deficits Reimbursement and Payment of Compensation Refer to the complainant's national tax number, which indicates that the complainant was actually raised on the departmental record because a tax The actor and the department should have taken action to enforce the judgment of the Supreme Court and there was a refund. The delay in the issuance of the refund due to the deduction of income tax through multiple payments of the golden glove was equivalent to being involuntary, for the complainant to receive compensation under Section 171 of the Federal Tax Ombuds Act. Also made the right to Chief Commission on Income
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2011
