AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus FARID KHAN
AXX, Rr 2 and 3 Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894), Sections 4, 11, 18, 23, 26 and 54 Land Acquisition Compensation Amount of Reimbursement by the Referee Court Increased referee court effect was determined not to sign decisions and decrees through land, but also to the amount of compensation. The collector landlords submitted the matter to the referee court, not satisfied with the collector's award, which the court ordered. Increased the amount of compensation. Although the verdict was announced in open court, it was stated that the decision and decree was not signed by the referee judge presiding officer, OXX, under the CPC, was obliged to make the decision after the same signature in open court. There was neither disclosure of approval of this interim order nor denial of reference, nor was it initiated. It was merely an opinion and could not be construed as a decision, such as through O XX, CPC and as such, the matter would be considered pending before the court under sections 18 to 26 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in compensation. A special procedure has been devised to investigate and deal with the filing of an application for enhancement or otherwise after the judgment has been pronounced in this case. The referee court declared in violation of the provisions of Section 26 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894, so Order XX, CPC could not be strictly enforced and appeal is allowed in accordance with the decision of the law in accordance with the law. And the reference will be considered pending before the referee judge, who was instructed to decide the case after hearing the parties.
