Article 199 Constitutional Application Regulating Citizen Services The matter of the applicant was that since he was appointed Research Officer in 2005, though on contract basis, his appointment was required because he was appointed He was left without a post. For a long time, the applicant was a contract employee and it was not the case that other employees on similar posts in the same department were regularized and denied the same treatment. The employee was, without discrimination. It was demanding regularization of his service which was not possible because the applicant's second dispute was because he was third on the first list of candidates and the other two were removed, so he was entitled to the appointment. The decision was not correct, because even if it was assumed that he was third on the first list, he would not produce a vein. In addition, without the promotion of this post, the appointment was a violation of fundamental rights.
