C.I.T./W.T., GUJRANWALA ZONE, GUJRANWALA versus DR. AKMAL HUSSAIN
Sections 122 and 111 (1) (b) amend the valuation Uncertain information Actions in wealth Nothing to prove credibility in wealth Final information wealth Activation in wealth was not supported by record of taxpayers ie annual income. The declaration was an operation to guarantee a `certain information ing 'under section 122 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, in terms of an order approved by the tax officer under section 122 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 The legal was based on legal grounds. The existence of certain information wealth The examination of the statements of wealth has confirmed the amendment of the assessment under section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, because, first of all, there is nothing in the record to accept the credibility of the wealth tax officer. Was. (1) In the case of section 122 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the tax year 2006 was available as "certain information" Ordinance, 2001. The order of the tax revenue officer approved under section 122 (1) (b) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 was not subject to any legal weakness, which was restored by the Appellate Tribunal Order of the Appellate Authority regarding the tax year, vacated on 2006. Done \ r \ n
Related judgments — Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan, 2011
