CHAUDHRY BROTHERS COTTON INDUSTRIES, BAHAWALPUR versus COLLECTOR (APPEALS) (REFUND), CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, MULTAN
Section & 66 and Sa 46 Sales Tax Refund Rules, 2006, R28 Refund Claim Claim Appeal Appellant refunded the deposit due to overpayment tax paid with electric bills. The claim was filed, the claim was rejected by the Deputy Collector. Appellant filed an appeal before the appellate tribunal after the order of dismissal by the collector (Appeal), submitted data on the software as well as the supporting software under R28 of Sales Tax Refund Rules 2006 Had to do. Within sixty days of the filing of the return, the document states that although the data were filed by the appellant after the expiry of the deadline, the affidavit imposed certain parameters on the applicant to be entitled to a refund of the claim. And had failed to comply. The conditions laid down under R28 of the Sales Tax Refund Rules 2006, their claims were rightfully rejected by the authorities and the order of dismissal could not be interfered with. The thirteenth and the same were retained
