Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Bail (murder case) 9 months in jail and the natural eye witness of the incident, as well as retrieving the guilty articles on the charges are still pending. Prosecution is unlikely to improve the case. Bail, under conditions [bail]
1976 P Cr. L J 876

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Farooqi, J

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1700/B of 1973, decided on 16th May, 1973,

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497 Bail--[Murder case]‑Accused in jail for 9 months and natural eye‑witnesses of occurrence as well as of recoveries of incriminating articles exonerating accused of charge‑‑‑Remaining witness not likely to improve prosecution case against accused‑‑ Accused granted bail, in circumstances.‑[Bail].

G. S. Chaudhry for Petitioner.

Muhammad Yamin for the State.

ORDER

Muhammad Ismail petitioner is facing an enquiry along with some others in a case under section 148/302/307/149, P. P. C. for committing the murder of Noor Muhammad (deceased) on 23rd August 1972, in prosecution of the common object of their unlawful assembly while armed with guns, pistols and dangs. He is in the judicial lock‑up for the last about nine months as he was refused bail by the Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura. He has now moved this Court for the same as in the meanwhile two of the four eye‑witness named in the F. I. R. had exonerated him in their evidence which third had watered down his testimony in his cross‑examination and the evidence of the fourth was inconclusive about his liability for this offence, which has not been seriously contested before me.

Even the two witness of the incriminating recoveries had also been declared hostile. The enquiry has however not concluded yet, but the evidence of thee remaining witnesses is not likely to improve the prosecution case. It was thus a clear case of further enquiry in the matter, I have, therefore, to accept this petition and direct that Muhammad Ismail petitioner shall be released from custody on his furnishing a bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000. (Rs. Ten thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Sheikhupura.

Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Topi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.