Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

INAYATULLAH versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Bail, Prior Arrest [Murder Case] First Information Report The name of the accused and the first information concerning the active role in the incident was contradicted in my report and the medical report, Not enough to allow bail before arrest. Further arrest of bail is equivalent to missing the opportunity to investigate the money laundering and the police to investigate the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 [Bail]

1976 P Cr. L J 676

[Lahore]

Before Aslam Riaz Hussain, J

INAYATULLAH‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2501/B of 1975, decided on 36th June 1975.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑----

‑‑‑‑-S. 498‑Bail, pre‑arrest‑‑[Murder case]‑Name of accused mentioned in First Information Report and active role in occurrence attributed‑Mere contradiction in First Information Report and medical report‑Held, not sufficient to allow bail before arrest Grant of bail held further, would amount to stiffing investigation and depriving Police of opportunity to investigate case properly Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302.‑[Bail].

Sardar Khizar Hayat Khan for Petitioner.

Ch. Muhammad Yamin for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail before arrest by Inayat Ullah under section 498, Cr. P. C. He is accused with some others of offence under sec tion 302/307/148/149, P. P. C., for causing the death of Zawar Ali Shah and making murderous assault on Abadat Ali Shah with fire‑arms.

2. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that according to the F. I. R. two persons namely, Inayat Ullah petitioner and Mushtaq, co‑accused had fired at the deceased. The medical evidence revealed only one injury that there was, therefore, contradiction between the medical report and the F. I. R. and that the petitioner is, therefore, entitled to the grand of bail.

3. As already mentioned above, the petitioner is involved in a murder case. His name is mentioned in the F.I.R. and he is attributed active role in the occurrence. I do not therefore think this is a fit case for grant of bail before arrest merely, because there appears to be some contradiction In the F.I.R. and the medical evidence. The grant of bail before arrest, to the petitioner would amount to sting the investigation and depriving the police of an opportunity to investigate the case properly. It is quite possible that during the investigation the alleged contradiction between the F.I.R. and the medical evidence may be resolved. As a result, the application for grant of bail before arrest to the petitioner is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Quaidabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.