Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZAKAT HUSSAIN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 3 523 Moving Property, Refusing to Deliver a Truck on Supdtree to a Challan Decision in Court Delinquency, Yet the Magistrate has not yet been presented to the court in section 3 523 Directed to decide the question according to the provisions. CR PC Panel Code (XLV of 1860) Section 406/420

1976 P Cr. L J 521

[Lahore]

Before K. M. A. Samdani, J

NAZAKAT HUSSAIN‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Criminal Revision No. 886 of 1973. heard on 22nd November 1973.

Criminal Procedure (Code V of 1898)---

----S. 523‑Movable property, custody of‑Court refusing to deliver truck on supardari till decision of case‑Challan, however, not put in Court as yet‑Illaqa Magistrate directed to decide question in accordance with provisions contained in S. 523, Cr. P. C.‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860). S. 405/420.

Raja Muhammad Muzaffar for Petitioner.

Sardar A. Khalid for A.‑G. Punjab for the State.

Kh. Sultan Ahmad for Respondent No. 2.

Date of hearing : 22nd November 1973.

JUDGMENT

This criminal revision has arisen out of a dispute over a truck between Nazakat Hussain petitioner and Manzur Hussain respondent No. 2 which is involved in a criminal case registered under sections 420 and 406, P. P. C. at police station Dina of Jhelum District. When in the course of investigation the question of the custody of the truck arose, Mr. Irshad‑ul‑Hassan, A. D. C(G), Jhelum, presumably exercising his Magisterial powers refused to deliver the truck on Sapurdari to Nazakat Hussain petitioner and left the question to be decided by the trial Court after the submission of Challan.

When the Sessions Judge, Jhelum, was moved in this behalf by the petitioner under sections 435, 438 and 439, Cr. P. C. the learned Sessions Judge made the present reference with the recommendation that the order of the learned Magistrate be reversed.

2. Since the challan in the case has not yet been put in Court, the question of Sapurdari should have been dealt with under section 523, Cr. P. C. It was wrong to have left it undecided until such tune as evidence was recorded at the trial.

However, since, under the order of the learned Magistrate the truck remains in the custody of the police, it is not necessary to reverse that order while deciding the present reference. The case is, nevertheless, remanded to the Ilaqa Magistrate to decide the question of custody afresh in accordance with law. The order of the A. D. C.(G) dated 13th of July 1973, shall be subject to the order of the I1aqa Magistrate.

3. The revision petition/reference stands disposed of accordingly.

Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Thari Mirwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.