PROGRESSIVE WEAVERS (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD versus C.I.T., FAISALABAD
Sections 2 (3), 9 and 11 Recommendations for Implementation of Impeachment Accusations Under Section 9 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000, investigation of accusations can be made if the allegations of error are proven to be correct. ? , The Federal Tax Ombudsman shall negotiate with the Revenue Division a recommendation under section 11 (1) of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000, and on the Revenue Division recommendation under section 11 (2) of the Ordinance. Will take action. And inform the Federal Tax Ombudsman. Or if you know the reasons for not taking action, if the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman does not believe the reasons for not taking action, they can forward the matter to the President as the defense of the Ordinance recommendation exam. It was not suggested that the parallel court forum or office appellate tribunal object of the competent court was to identify mismanagement by officials acting under tax laws. And it was not the order itself to endorse the grievances or resolve them, it was to the Revenue Division to change the legality of waiver or commission proceedings, which it did not even have the authority to act on and be aware of. ? Reasons for not taking action Conversely, a court or tribunal ruling will change the legal role of an unspecified order and defendants can only seek solutions in accordance with the law so that the investigation of allegations of corruption is subject to section 9 (2) Was conditional. Establishment of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000, to prevent the overriding of judicial powers imposed by the authorities under the principles of the relevant laws.
