Find a Lawyer

ANMOL PAPER MILLS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE versus C.I.R., (LEGAL DIVISION) R.T.O., LAHORE

Taxes imposed in Sections A ((&) and B (B)) have not been levied, nor a small tax has been imposed or the money has been incorrectly refunded, for reasons of record in writing. Accordingly, provided that such extension period does not exceed 90 days in any case.The show cause notice was issued on 9-10 2004 and the order was passed on and on 15-11 2006. Sales tax The restrictions imposed by law under section 36 (3) of the Act 1990 were not explicitly barred by the law and it was stated that the order under this section should be approved within that time. The order was originally exceeded in the law, it was not sustainable and had to be annulled, as well as orders by the appellate tribunal. Deleted and the request created was deleted

Related judgments — Inland, 2011

• ALBERTA SPORTS (PVT.) LTD. SIALKOT v. C.I.R., R.T.O., SIALKOT 2011 PTD 2169
• IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE v. COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE (APPEALS), LAHORE 2011 PTD 2171
• ADNAN HONDA CENTRE, KAMRA v. COLLECTOR (APPEALS) SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, R.T.O., RAWALPINDI 2011 PTD 2180
• AL-FATEH TRADERS, KARACHI v. COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE (APPEAL), KARACHI 2011 PTD 2194
• C.I.T., ZONE-1, R.T.O.; KARACHI v. Mrs. SALMA AMIN TAI, SECURITIES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI 2011 PTD 2234
• UNITEX INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI v. A.C.I.R.-B, AUDIT DIVISION-I, R.T.O., KARACHI 2011 PTD 2252
• AVARI HOTELS LIMITED, KARACHI v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LEGAL DIVISION, L.T.U., KARACHI 2011 PTD 2265
• KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION, LTD., KARACHI v. COMMISSIONER/ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RANGE B, ZONE-III, LTU, KARACHI 2011 PTD 2286

All Inland judgments of 2011 →

famous lower court advocate from Noor kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes