MUHAMMAD USMAN KHAN versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Article 199 The Constitution of the Golden Hand Shake Scheme (GHS) began in 1997 with the applicants voluntarily exercising the powers of the employees to reap the benefits of the scheme and to terminate their services on different dates in 1998. Was announced. The Board of Directors decided on 27-2 1998, giving ad hoc relief to its employees from 1-1 1998, except that the applicants who chose the scheme had to calculate the benefits of the scheme in their last salary. Wanted to include ad hoc relief in my salary. Acceptance of legal liabilities by an employee will not constitute acceptance of him as an unhappy person. There must be grounds for discrimination among employees on the grounds of compulsory reasons and hard work, and there is no reasonable basis for the record of ad hoc relief for employees who have remained. Denying other employees, who have chosen scheme compensation and pensions under T, his scheme was based on basic salary. Nothing is on record to show the integration of ad hoc relief in applicants if employed. Applicants will be entitled to include the advertisement if the basic salary on the date of separation is received in the aggregate under the scheme. For the purpose of such benefit, Hood Relief Advent Relief cannot be included for the purpose of calculating compensation or changing pension as it is different from basic salary. Applicants calculate benefits based on their expenses. Deserved because of their last business history of the Constitution
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
