A. VII, Rr 2, 10 and Section 20 suit for the recovery of suit amounted to the court's territorial jurisdiction. The plaintiff's return court filed a case against the defendants for the money. None of them lived or worked. In the territorial limits of the courts; H; and that the cause alleged by the plaintiff was entirely within the boundaries of the courts. Return to the plaintiff for filing, according to which the court was in his place. I allowed the trial court to return the petition through the defendants, but upon filing an appeal from the defendant, the appellate court remanded the trial court to remand the trial court for further proceedings, After that the issue of territorial jurisdiction was considered. If justification for a reasonable issue in this regard was the refusal or failure to repay any debt owed in whole or in part, it would be the cause of any litigation. And this will be considered as the place where the money was to be refunded. The courts of that place have jurisdiction under section 20 (c) on the matter, if the CPC The agreement between them does not indicate where the money was to be paid. And the relevant facts and circumstances did not identify it, then the principle that the debtor had to find his lender would be enforced and not in the present case where the lender lived or worked for profit. The same area
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
