Se 302 (b) / 365 A / 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (e) Referring to the Third Judge of the High Court between two High Court judges for abduction for ransom, the Chief Justice The conviction of appreciating the evidence was reduced by the two judges unanimously agreeing that the accused were charged under Section 230 (b), the PPC state counsel did not prove as well as the complainant admitted. That the accused was not proven guilty of murder. , Acquitted of the murder charge under Section 2302 (b) under the circumstances, the PPC theft was recovered on the indictment of the accused, the evidence regarding the theft recovery was not lodged in any material sense by the contentious examination, Another piece of evidence against the accused was the retrieval. Purse and money notes were not given the number of notes, but they were sealed and presented to the court at the time of the evidence. Suspicions on this particular aspect remained as unprovoked prosecution. I had established the role of accused, the prosecutor has successfully taken into account the age of the accused and the circumstances of the matter under section 365A, PPC and section ((e) Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997). Sentenced - The accused was retained, the death sentence was converted to life imprisonment
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
