Section 249A Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 217, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477 A / 34 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Rules, RR 2 (g), 3 and 11 (2) of 1993, Sindh Bribery and Corruption Act (XXIV of 1950), Section 3 Disobedience of law by public servant, criminal breach of trust by a public servant, fraud, fraud Application for the filing of a criminal case against a public servant without prior authorization, without prior permission, for the use of a false document, real-time fake documents, account fraud and corrupt magistrate powers The CRPC was authorized to acquit the accused at any stage of the trial. There were; oily, that hearings should be given to the prosecutor and the lawyer for the accused. Secondly, the reasons should be recorded in support of the conclusion that the allegation was baseless. Or there is no possibility that under Section 249A, the CRPC, an application for a conviction can be filed at any stage of the proceedings. And it was not necessary and did not require that the application should be filed only after the evidence of all witnesses was recorded, the magistrate had the power to acquit the accused at any stage of the trial under Section 249A, CRPC. Granted, if the prosecutor and the defendant after the hearing and for reasons of recording, he considered the charge baseless. Or that the accused was not involved in the FIR, as there was no possibility of being found guilty of any crime in this case, pursuant to Section 3 of the Sindh Bribery and Corruption Act 1950, the matter was investigated by him. Will be
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
