Find a Lawyer

RIJHOMAL versus TARACHAND

Article 133 Cross-examination Object If a complex version of material point of fact becomes irrelevant and unfounded, it will be deemed to be admitted and accepted as the true purpose of the cross examination is twofold. To bring Modifying the Chief Exam or setting up a cross-inspector's case and giving a witness credit test helps in the quest for the right, and when it is specified, removing something from the opponent's lips in favor of a cross-sponsor is an art. Is. Their assertion in the examination by the witness is substantially consistent with the contention that it is not challenged by the contrary proposition, such a claim can be credited. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ASIF ALI SIDDIQUI alias ALI v. State 2011 YLR 1120
• UNITED EXPORTS COMPANY, KARACHI v. REGIONAL TAX OFFICER through Commissioner, Enforcement and Collection Division (I), Karachi 2011 PTD 1128
• Syed RIZWAN ALI v. State 2011 MLD 1131
• MURAD ALI v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1133
• MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. State 2011 YLR 1138
• IQBAL HUSSAIN v. State 2011 MLD 1142
• S.M.E., LEASING LIMITED v. UMAR KNITTING 2011 CLD 1144
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. State 2011 YLR 1147

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes