Section 2 302 (a) Appreciating the Evidence of Evidence Taking advantage of the privilege, the place from which the body was recovered, from where the accused fired the victim and the prosecution's witness was collected. In the statement under section 164, CCP was found in the statement of the prosecution's witness regarding the location of the arrest of the accused and the recovery of the criminal weapon, the ocular witnesses contradicted the medical evidence, the crime weapon The recovery was not only suspicious, but also one, after seven days of delay, the prosecution sent for expert opinion brought several improvements to the case which made the case a rivalry between the complainant and the accused. It was said that the accused had outlined the complainant's direction: The death sentence could not be punished in a case where the prosecutor failed. Bill had failed to prove his case by way of an apology testimony. Counsel was prepared for the recovery of both weapons of the crime, which made the case very skeptical when the three prosecution witnesses were present, but they showed no resistance nor any attempt to get the accused under control. Neither tried to save. The accused was a close relative of the victim to the clutches of witnesses and no independent or private person was examined in this case, nor was the counselor made in this case nor did the witnesses show any interesting testimony in this case. And the court will not base the conviction of the accused in the death penalty case. There was unnecessary delay in recording statements by the police on the testimony of the only and only interested witnesses, the prosecution was beyond any reasonable doubt
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
