The OI, R 10 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and 54, were based on the necessary party sub-lease executed as a claimant for the plaintiff and the defendant / applicant as they were subject to the flats in question by the registered sub-lease. The defendants / applicants who were claiming ownership were in physical possession of the flats in question, this fact was evident from the respondent's affidavit filed by the plaintiff, in which he stated that the defendants / applicants had received the affidavit. In question, the flats were seized and he lodged an FIR in the police FIR in which the plaintiff K.S. The affidavit indicated in the affidavit that the plaintiff is fully aware that the intervening applicants have possession of the flats in question and that they have intervened in the defendants / applicants in order to reduce the dispute and avoid litigation. Was not guaranteed as a defendant in the Plaintiff's High Court. Defendants / Applicants are allowed to become respondents and enter a modified title of the plaintiffs application
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
