Find a Lawyer

NOOR REHMAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substance (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 9 (c), 14 and 15 of the arrest of drug paraphernalia, a felony conviction or a felony in connection with drug offenses, with the defendant's denial. Determination of the absence of private advisers was not adequately explained during the recovery of large quantities of heroin and marijuana seized by the police or any reason for the instability was not given by the police for the accused involved. The Chemical Examiner's report was positive or no other matter. Section 497 (2) means, the CCP was dismissed, it was alleged that he was involved in a hate crime, was not entitled to bail application was dismissed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• GULSHAN-E-EAISAL, COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, LTD. through Secretary v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2011 PLD 163
• UNITED PAPER BOARD AND CONE INDUSTRIES through Partner v. SINDH INDUSTRIAL TRADING ESTATE LTD. 2011 YLR 167
• FAYYAZ ALI v. EMPLOYER/OWNER OF FACTORY 2011 PLC 167
• HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED v. FIRST DAWOOD INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED 2011 CLD 168
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. WAQAR AKHTAR 2011 CLC 172
• CRESCENT STAR INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2011 CLD 173
• AYAZ v. State 2011 PCrLJ 177
• MUHAMMAD MASOOD BUTT v. S.M. CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. 2011 PLD 177

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

law firms from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes