Find a Lawyer

YOUSIF KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substance (XVV of 1997), Section 9 (b) (c) possession of drug paraphernalia, further investigation grant was born whether section (b) or clause. (C) of section 9 of the Act. The case was attracted by the Control of Narcotic Materials Act 1997. Receiving sufficient amount of money from the accused did not mean that the amount was in the difference between marijuana and because of this, further investigation was needed in the case of section 497 (2) of the Chemical Examiner's report. , CR PC suspect admitted on bail under conditions \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• LIAQUAT HUSSAIN v. SAUDI AIR LINE 2011 CLC 314
• MUHAMMAD ATHER HAFEEZ KHAN v. SSANGYONG AND USMANI JV 2011 YLR 317
• MUHAMMAD AQIB SHAHID v. CHIEF OF THE NAVAL STAFF, NAVAL HEADQUARTERS, ISLAMABAD 2011 PLC(CS) 321
• ARABTEC PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. ENSHAANLC DEVELOPMENTS (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLC 323
• MUHAMMAD ESSA RIND v. State 2011 MLD 335
• E.O.B.I. OFFICERS\' ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN v. EMPLOYEES\' OLD AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION (EOBI) 2011 PLC 336
• SHAHBAZ v. State 2011 PCrLJ 338
• RAMOON alias RAMZAN v. State 2011 MLD 340

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

family advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes