Find a Lawyer

IMDAD ALI versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) / Q 34 According to the investigation, the witness and the other two witnesses of the complaint remained irrelevant during the lengthy investigation and the accused committed the murder of the victim to avenge his murder. The father could not identify any contradiction or contradiction in the prosecution's evidence, witnesses from both sides had no reason to be falsely implicated in the case and the collateral evidence was consistent with the medical evidence as well as the evidence of recovery. There were also empty bullets and empty cartridges. The molecular evidence recovered from the location of the incident was reliable and the affective conviction

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• TANVEER AHMED v. State 2011 PCrLJ 677
• A. R. AUTOS through Muzzafar Din Shaikh, Karachi v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD 2011 PTD 683
• INAMUL HAQ v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, through Secretary to Government of Sindh 2011 PLC(CS) 685
• BAGO v. State 2011 MLD 685
• Malik FAYYAZ AHMED v. MUHAMMAD AFSAR BUTT 2011 CLC 693
• ALI HASSAN v. State 2011 MLD 700
• KHADIJA EDIBLE OIL REFINERY (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 709
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Cabinet Division 2011 PLC(CS) 709

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

female advocates from Thul lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes