Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Murder of the Bell, Further Investigation Prosecutor's Grant claimed that a pistol was recovered from the front. And that the four properties recovered from this location failed to indicate whether the crime counts in this case were not mentioned in the report of the Assistant Public Prosecutor of the Franz Science Laboratory. A match was found with the pistol. Further, the accused's lawyer admitted that the accused's name was not mentioned in the FIR, since the person who filed the FIR did not know the culprit, so it could not be expected that the FIR The names will also be mentioned in the accused's lawyers. It was also claimed that the shootings were from a motorcycle, so, at best, the witnesses got a glimpse of the accused and after sixteen months it was not expected that the witnesses would remember who had committed such aspects. Only people can be crushed. After recording the evidence, the only piece of evidence in this case was the identification parade, if the space was tested and matched with the recovered pistol, the position MLGHT was different, but the accused was not. Due to a further investigation against him, he was granted bail under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
