Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence The prosecution's case was stayed only on the testimony of the circumstances when the witness last saw the victim in the company of the accused was related to the complainant and no evidence of his statement was supported. The prosecutor did not examine who was with him at the time Medical evidence completely erased the complainant's claim that on the day of the incident, the deceased had left his house on his donkey car and claimed the last witness. Also at 11 o'clock in the morning, the victim was seen with the accused that NIC and the victim's shoes were recovered from the scene. The accused could not be linked to the crime; no motive, weak or strong was shown against the accused. Additional judicial confession of the alleged victim by the accused revealed that the accused had killed the victim in his donkey car. Was beaten up for robbery, but according to the complainant and another witness, the victim's donkey basket was also available from his body for a delay of one and a half months in the supplementary statement given by the complainant and under section 161. And in recording the witness statement, the CCP involved the suspect in the case. It is also fatal in the prosecution case, the chain of affairs was presented by the most interested witnesses, who raised reasonable doubts about the prosecution case, which was met with contradictions and impossibilities. He was acquitted.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
