Find a Lawyer

RIAZ ALI ALIAS RAJOO versus STATE

Section 1 561A Narcotic Substance Control (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Appeal for a trial for drug possession proceedings was pending in the court of competent jurisdiction and the evidence of this case The decision had to be made after examining and evaluating the evidence. ; And to give the prosecutor the opportunity to include his evidence, under which the practice of excessive jurisdiction under Section Crlated AA was terminated by the CCP; the application for imprisonment was dismissed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• JAN MUHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ QURESHI 2011 MLD 994
• SHAHI TEXTILES v. ASKARI BANK LIMITED 2011 CLD 995
• Dr. Syed MISBAH-UZ-ZAFAR v. Mst. ROOHANA 2011 CLC 995
• MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. State 2011 PCrLJ 996
• NAZEER MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 MLD 1000
• RANJHO v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1002
• HABIB BANK LTD. v. UNIVERSAL CARGO SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. 2011 CLD 1003
• Moulvi SAIFULLAH MEMON v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2011 CLC 1004

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

list of advocates from Kallat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes