Find a Lawyer

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/120B / 114/11/147/148/149 Qutel AMD, criminal conspiracy, criminal disapproval of the accused due to the disappearance of interim bail, And the prosecution was not equipped with any evidence, which could have led to the allegation that he was involved in a crime that may have involved a religious element, as one witness said he had been imprisoned by some prisoners. 'S screams have been heard. On the night of the incident, the pre-approved interim bail for the accused was confirmed on the same terms and conditions as interim bail for all the accused.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• SAFAR-UR-REHMAN v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1334
• ABU BAKR v. LAL TAJ KHAN 2011 MLD 1339
• IQBAL SHAH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1342
• SHAHNAWAZ KUTRIO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh 2011 PLC(CS) 1343
• GHULAM ABBAS v. State 2011 YLR 1348
• SALEEM IQBAL QURESHI v. A.I. BROTHERS (PVT.) LTD. 2011 YLR 1351
• BAKHTIAR AHMED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Education and Literacy Department 2011 PLC(CS) 1353
• Miss JAVARIA v. MEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, JAMSHORO 2011 CLC 1356

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

best law firm from Sara e Naurang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes