Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

REHMATULLAH versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM


Article 199 Right Leachs Petitioner Claims to Pass a Order 13 Years After Filing a Petition and Passing Order for More Than 12 Years of Approval of an Order Approving the Settlement Authority Announcement The presence of the parties at the time of the decision and the mention of their lawyer, no reasonable person will have to wait such a long time to know the outcome of their application, no exception, cannot be held, they are decided by the High Court. The writ petition cannot be ordered on the basis of the leach.

1975 S C M R 188

Present : Muhammad Yaqub Ali and Abdul Kadir Shaikh, JJ

Mian REHMATULLAH--‑Petitioner

versus

MUHAMMAD AKRAM AND OTHERS---‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 253 of 1974, decided on 3rd December 1974.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated I1‑1‑1974 in Writ Petition No. 52‑R of 1974).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑---

.‑‑ Art. 199‑Writ‑Laches ‑ Petitioner filing writ petition nearly 13 years after passing of order by Settlement authority and claiming ignorance of order till more than 12 years after passing of order- Settlement authority's order mentioning presence of parties and their counsel at time of pronouncement of order‑No reasonable person, held, would wait for such a long period to know result of his application‑No exception, held, could be taken to High Court's order dismissing writ petition on ground of laches.

Muhammad Nawaz Kasuri, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 3rd December 1974.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB Ali, J

.‑On 8th August 1951, the Settlement Commissioner dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner herein against the order of transfer of the house in dispute in favour of the respondent. The parties were heard and the order announced to them.

On 11th January 1974, the petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court claiming ignorance of the order passed by the Settlement Commis sioner on the 8th August 1961. The learned Single Judge did not find any ground for condoning the delay of more than 12 years and dismissed the writ petition for laches.

The petitioner now seeks leave to appeal reiterating that he has no knowledge of the order passed by the learned Settlement Commissioner. We are unable to accept the statement made by the petitioner as mentioned above. It is clearly stated in the order of the Settlement Commissioner that the parties and their counsel were present when the order was announced. In any case, no reasonable person will wait for nearly 13 years to know the result of revision petition which tie had filed in the Court of Settlement Commissioner. In the circumstances no exception can be taken to the order passed bpi the High Court.

Leave to appeal is refused.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Kandhkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.