The prosecution, prosecuting only the two police officers who examined the definition of evidence prohibiting drug and trafficking in section C & C, owned a car used to transport drugs. No explanation was offered. The chassis number stated that the owner of the vehicle was found to be non-productive and unchecked. Accused of using the car because of the crime, under the circumstances, the law was not sustainable Burden was charged with litigation to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. And the law alleges that unless he can be reasonably suspected to be guilty, there are material contradictions in the presence of both prosecutor's witnesses, contradicting the material contradiction with the evidence of both prosecution witnesses for the possession of drugs / artifacts. Is, the prosecution failed to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the impeachment order passed by the special court, these circumstances were set aside
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
