Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHALID SHARIF versus STATE


Article 185 (3) can never be summoned before the High Court and cannot be allowed to go on leave at the appeal stage.

1975 S C M R 178

Present : Salahuddin Ahmed and Muhammad Gul, JJ

KHALID SHARIF‑---Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑‑-Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑30 of 1974, decided on 16th September 1974.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind & Baluchistan, dated the 11th April 1974, in Criminal Revision No. 48 of 1974).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑---

‑‑ Art. 185(3)‑Point never raised before High Court‑Cannot be permitted to be raised at leave to appeal stage.

Ansar Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Anwar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing : 16th September 1974.

ORDER

SALAHUDDIN AHMED, J

.‑‑The petitioner was convicted and sentenced under section 6 (1) (a) and (c) read with section 23 of the West Pakistan Pure Food Ordinance, 1960. On appeal the learned Additional Sessions Judge maintained the conviction but reduced the sentence. The conviction and sentence has been maintained by the High Court of Sind & Baluchistan in revision.

The prosecution case was that the petitioner was found to have stored in his shop for sale 'Atta' in which Gluton was 1 per cent less than required under the rules framed under the said Ordinance. Under the rules the Atta should have contained 8 per cent Gluton. The Public Analyst, however, found that it was 1 per cent less. The seizure of the Atta from the shop of the petitioner is not challenged. The High Court concurred in the findings of the two Courts holding the petitioner guilty.

On behalf of the petitioner the following contentions were raised before us:‑-

(1) The Public Analyst was not legally appointed.

(2) Since the analysis was done 7 days after the taking of samples the Atta deteriorated due to damp climate, of Karachi.

These points were never raised before the High Court and cannot now be permitted to be raised.

There is no substance in the petition and it is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner shall now surrender to his bail bond and serve out the remainder of the sentence of imprisonment imposed on him.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Sukkur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.