Section 265K, and 561 A Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), stopping section 363 kidnapping proceedings did not show the accused equipped with any weapon, even in the complaint alleging that the accused had taken the other accomplices to the complainant and others. Witnesses were ordered to be abducted, the complainant denied another statement, in which he himself stated that on the date of the incident, the accused came with the police and asked the police to arrest the complainant. Such fact clearly showed that there was no excuse for the abduction, but it was the policemen who came to the police mobile and the accused The complainant and his two accomplices were allegedly arrested in the absence of an allegation that the accused was carrying a weapon or ordered the abducting party, as alleged. The complainant was told by the complainant himself that he was arrested by the police and released two hours later. The facts had denied the allegation that the accused had intended to take Ovi. There was no possibility of conviction of the relevant accused, the trial court rejected the plea of the accused under section 265 Voice was not considered, CRPC action was canceled, under circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
