Article 302/148/149 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 265H (2) Qatil Ahmed, appreciating the evidence, the trial court acquitted the two accused as their case was found suspicious in light of the evidence. Which was close. For the same reason that the accused was convicted, the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses contradicts the fact that five bores of 12 bores were not obtained under the memorandum prepared for the protection of blood-stained material and such effects. Because there was no expert report and nothing was presented as the property of the case, those who arrived at the scene after hearing the gunshot were not picked up because the witness police did not investigate the complaining party and Believed him and his witnesses blindly and did not take legal action against the nominees on account of which Had not yielded any positive result. Evidence Even the available witness was presented in court with no excuse and no excuse The trial court took the two completely differently based on the same evidence and the scope of the law, and the theory of guilt, It is not endorsed by the prosecutor's representative in the trial court's judicial decision, with no valid reason, both defending each other in a decisive case; such decision was not allowed to be sustained.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
