Find a Lawyer

JAVED versus STATE

Attempts to compile Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 324 of Qatil AMD and Qatal Ahmed bail cannot be carried out at the pilot stage. It remains to be seen whether the accused is a member of the commission of the crime, the prosecution has failed to identify any evidence that led to the controversy at the time of the various documents which the suspect had raised. And made the case for further inquiry, in those cases, entitled to bail

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011

• FAISAL ELAHI v. State 2011 PTD 2714
• LIAQUAT ALI v. BAKHSH ALI alias BAKHSHO 2011 YLR 2731
• SAIFUDDIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2011 PTD 2760
• WAHEED RAZA PATHAN v. State 2011 YLR 2760
• PATHAN v. State 2011 YLR 2792
• PUNHOON JAFFERY v. State 2011 YLR 2803
• TARIQUE v. State 2011 YLR 2818
• TAYYAB v. State 2011 YLR 2836

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2011 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes