Section 426 (1A) [as entered by the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act (VIII of 2011)] on some dates due to the absence of the complainant's lawyer at the hearing of the case. Was postponed. The only and only reason is the inactivity or lack of concern or unfair treatment of the accused, but there were many other reasons for the delay that could not be blamed for the accused, just to deny it. To deny or disagree with or disagree with Section 426 (1A) of the section, before the CCP sentence was suspended and guaranteed, the Legislature had previously imposed an obligation and responsibility on the court. The defendant may be released on bail to investigate and examine the cause of the case, except where it was held that an appeal or an adjournment delayed the appeal decision. Such legal right was subject to the fulfillment of the standard and a decisive factor in being on behalf of him or her or any other person. Writing under clauses (a) to (c) of section 426 (1A), the CCP court must also investigate, whether the person who applied for bail was a first offense or age. The prison was not punishable by crime or crime. Or said that the person was desperate or that the dangerous criminal high court was not obliged to examine the case on merit and that he should remove the deeply entrenched prisoners by deciding the application under section 426, CRPC. The appeal was heard from 9 11 2004. And all the appellants had already used up a considerable part of their sentence, which was more than half the sentence. Not all appellants were guilty before and theirs
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2011
