AL-AHRAM BUILDERS LIMITED versus PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS\' HOUSING AUTHORITY
Section 12 of the Act (Article 10 of 1984), Article 114 suit for the specific performance of the contract to sell proof of contract, the principle of claim of the claimant was that the case was brought before the defendant by the society. 17 society was taken under the conditions laid down in the letter of 1974. Is this a result of the letter fraud? As plaintiff, his plaintiff had clearly accepted the offer in the letter and the proceedings initiated by him were withdrawn, though the details of the case filed by the plaintiff were not on record during the evidence. But his statement was corroborated by such plaintiff's testimony that nothing was on the record by the plaintiff and the defendant did not withdraw from the law to substantiate such claim. The defendant was invited on 17 6 1974 as he withdrew from the commitment made by the proposed post and offered to transfer the plot in response. Under this the plaintiff submitted the proposals and was accepted by the Managing Committee of the respondent society and the unconditional offer was made to the plaintiff without any reservation. A valid agreement was made to transfer the property subject to the defendant's failure to identify any illegal or irregularities in the allotment in favor of the plaintiff, therefore, it could not rescind the same suit in the circumstances. Was given. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
