Section 13 Legislative Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 2 (d), 70, 71, 72, 73 and 129 (f) (g) of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), the performance of discriminatory evidence before Article 27 cases Demonstration was the starting point for a copyright claim until student demonstration was proven until the student's credibility was demonstrated that acquiring knowledge of the sale by a person is a fact described in Article 2 (d). Conan e testimony, 1984 All facts other than the contents of a document may be proved by oral evidence under Article 70 of the testimony of the law, the testimony of the 1984 law, Article 71 of 1984 provided that the oral evidence should be direct and if so The evidence of what can be seen is the fact that it can be seen, it must be the evidence of a witness who says that he has seen it, and if it means something that can be heard, then it is a witness. There must be proof that the person who said he heard the plaintiff knew. The testimony of the law, which was not examined under Article 129 (g) of the 1984 advertisement, indicates that it could be removed from the test without the person mentioned that it may not have supported the plaintiffs' court as it was known It is reported that the performance of Talit Mawiat was not performed as it was stated that the person / informant was not examined and the notice of the student was not denied by the defendants. The burden of proving this is also provided for in the Claimant Section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, especially for the issuance of notice of the students as the registered cover is thereby ensuring delivery of the notice. Emphasis has been given on adoption
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
