Sections 9, 10 and 32 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Rules of Sections 382B and 401 Pakistan Prisons, 199 to 223 Corruption and Corruption Charges against criminal offenses of trust by public servants. Sentenced to imprisonment during the detention period, the accused's remission award was sentenced to 14 years in prison, and the total sentence with a further fine was one year, up to 15 years, as mentioned in the recent roll. Unexpected part of the case was 5 years and one month with the accused, the month did not question the sentence awarded by the NAB court, but he Red if the sentence is added at the post-conviction pardon, he had already spent more than 16/2 years, according to the suspect. Joomla; and the superintendent deserving of his release from prison, along with the Central Jail, failed to account for the appropriate amnesty. And the accused was also denied the privilege of pardon for his previous sentence, the accused already serving more than 16 years. And if the jail authorities had properly considered the amnesty, the accused would have been released long ago, the superintendent of the Central Jail, was instructed to calculate the amnesty. And if, according to Chapter 8 of the Pakistan Jail Rules, the amnesty was found, the accused had already served 15 years in prison, under circumstances, he would be released soon.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
