MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB
17 and 18 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petitioner, Appointment of Appointment Order Approved by District Officer Revenue (DOR), Appeal filed by nine candidates including the Applicant Board of Revenue, Appeal for review by the Board of Revenue Due to lack of permission to allow the applicant to participate in the post-remand process of appointment, review requests were filed by only three candidates and the DoR was remanded to decide the matter. Through the approval of the EDO and the Board of Revenue, every citizen had the fundamental right to contest for any vacant seat, and the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution govern the Board of Revenue's rule in his remand. There was no limited process of appointing a lumberman to the order, to the extent that the reviewer applied, but it has opened the door for all amended candidates to participate in the competition, regardless of whether or not a revision has been filed. No, the High Court has directed the DRO to set forth the subsequent orders and to treat the other competing candidates as such and to re-appoint such appointment. Considering the competence of all eligible candidates, including applicants in accordance with law and regulation in this regard
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
