Article VII, R 2, O XIII, Rr 1, 2 and Section 151 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 78 suit for the preparation of the original document, the two parties presented their respective evidence in the evidence of their claim, The trial court dismissed the SEED plea seeking a NAB official as a court witness at the stage of refusal evidence filed for the petitioner, observing that the defendant, despite presenting certified copies of the required documents in his denial, Can provide certified copies of the following documents. Some original documents were submitted; the plaintiff's evidence in the plaintiff's case objected to the display and marking of the documents, which the trial court rejected the defendant's objection and said that the documents should be admitted according to the evidence. Allowed, without law evidence, under Article 78 of the Constitution Evidence, 1984, signatures and handwritten documents that were allegedly signed or written, documents could not be taken into evidence in the statement of the plaintiff's lawyer. Documents were not legally valid, and it was sufficient to understand that the documents were filed without proof. Gone, they will be used against the defendant. And it certainly would be prejudicial to consider that the unwanted order by the trial court to allow the plaintiff to present the original documents without any evidence, to display these documents and in accordance with O XII, CPC To return the plaintiff, the trial court was instructed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
