Article 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan and Schedule Entry No 9, Article 199 Constitutional Application for Retention of Gold Jewelry, Recovery of Words - Wife's Own Ownership and Equipment wife The suit suit filed by the wife against her husband, Family The Court Lower Appellate Court allowed the appeal and the husband dismissed the case in favor of the wife, claiming that the appeal was not before the lower appellate court because no court fee was imposed by the wife. The court had jurisdiction under Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, to entertain, hear and decide on matters referred to in Part I of the Schedule of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, while the property in the schedule was personal. The property and its contents were specified. The wife, in whose case a family lawsuit can be brought, did not testify for the husband that the gold jewelry belonged to his wife but the head of the nation stated in the investigation that he did not know whose gold jewelry was. In possession, such testimony of the husband's testimony was significant and inconsistent and to find out that the gold jewelry was with the husband, no illegal or irregularity was found in the judgment and the decree passed. Wind. Application for spouse dismissed in circumstances requiring the High Court to interfere in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
