Find a Lawyer

IRFAN versus STATE

Section 4 36 30, 2 Kid murder and murder 34 Kidnapping or abduction for murder, murder, murder Many people appreciate the evidence of the acts of the joint intention The benefit of the suspicions Confession of suspicion Criminal The accused could not be sentenced due to additional prosecution. Confession and recovery of half of the rickshaw that was made without celebrating an independent witness from the area. Such recovery was suspicious and the benefit of the doubt should have gone to the accused, in the absence of any direct evidence, the accused cannot be punished and in any case can be sentenced to life imprisonment. The confession is the weakest form of evidence, which requires careful review and was designated by supplemental statements recorded five months after the precautionary event No direct evidence from the commission of the crime case against the accused. Was unconnected and the benefit of the doubt was extended to the extent that the appeal was accepted on the basis of the accepted decision aside from the charge

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• HAQ NAWAZ v. State 2011 PLD 84
• MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2011 PCrLJ 85
• ABDUL REHMAN alias GAGI v. State 2011 PLD 92
• HABIB BANK LTD. through duly Authorized Attorneys v. FAIQA TRADING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. through Director and Chief Executive Officer 2011 CLD 92
• MURAD TARIQ v. State 2011 YLR 96
• MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. ABDUL RAUF 2011 MLD 96
• Dr. GHULAM RABANI KHAN v. PCSIR through Chairman, Islamabad 2011 PLC(CS) 99
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS KHAN LODHI v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE 2011 PLD 102

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

family advocate from Lalamusa lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes