Section 426 (1A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) / 337 F (iii) / 34 of suspension was found to be a legal delay and they were convicted by the trial court and an appeal was heard against the sentence. Been there 27 2 Since 2007 it was decided before the High Court that the two petitions submitted by the complainant, which were already dismissed for suspension of the sentence filed by the accused, were amended by section 426 (1). A) In view of the suspension of the sentence, the CCP was an independent right and the accused may properly apply for relief even after his application for dismissal under section 262626 is rejected, the CRPC accused In no way was he liable to delay the decision of his appeal and his case was not brought under this section under section 2626 (1A). The CRPC High Court upheld the appeal. Touched, according to which the suspended sentence was given permission
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
