Sections 302 and 201 will be appreciated because of the morning, the disappearance of evidence of the crime, or the inaccuracy of the screen offender, the presence of eyewitnesses at the scene of the incident immediately appeared to be natural because they immediately Could not reach File an FIR and the bill account was verified by medical evidence. The brutality of the perpetrators of the crime was enough to frighten witnesses who did not risk their lives to save the victim's witnesses, with no intention or unlawful desire to falsely execute the accused. Was not The accused had established the accused with the deceased at the scene of the incident. The accused tried to dispose of evidence of the case by making a false plea of alibi through a stranger's false plea in the hotel register, which he claimed to hold on to the date of the incident. The suspect remained suspicious. Instead of filing an FIR, he fled the scene and tried to create a false story of Alibi, stating that his involvement in the case was always undercut by the accused, and in every case, to be traced. It was not possible, therefore, to prove the motive was not fatal in the case of the prosecution where the evidence of the accused's involvement in the indictment was substantiated by the other evidence presented by the prosecution. The trial court has ruled that the case was beyond doubt. Barbarism was not declared eligible. He was retained and convicted of the crime for any kind of softening and upon confirmation, the murder
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
