Sections 302 (b) and 365 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) (e) Conduct of Conventions (10 of 1984), Article 40, abduction for abduction or ransom, acts of terrorism Definition of evidence in this case There was no available account of eyewitnesses in this case, but the pernicious behavior and information provided by the criminals, which found the body of a 6-year-old boy abducted, is a rich source of evidence. The source proved, he dispelled any doubts, no enmity, whoever was with the complainant has been accused by the accused that he is the complainant's sister, the complainant's There was no motive for falsely accusing his son of murdering a prosecution witness, who testified in court as an independent witness, evidence of which was credible other prosecutor witness, who was a friend of the complainant, in this case The evidence of the Investigating Officer was straightforward, and no illegal intervention was brought against him. n The record does not indicate any weakness or defect in its evidence. There is no reason to deny any evidence affecting such conviction; the information presented by the accused to the Inquiring Officer is against the law. Can be used under Article 40 of the evidence, medical evidence confirmed the ocular account. The prosecutor, without any reasonable doubt, proved his case against the accused, the accused was rightfully sentenced and sentenced to death, accused on oath for defying impressive evidence of such conviction. There was nothing specific in the statement that was properly excluded by the trial court and
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
