Find a Lawyer

LIAQAT ALI versus NAAZIR ALI

The suit for dismissing the case for Articles 6 and 13 was rejected by the lower courts simultaneously on the ground that the plaintiff had failed to make the tablets according to the law, contradicting the statement of the plaintiff and his testimony. There is about time. The accused witness who was told that he had informed the plaintiff about the sale did not reveal the exact date, time and place of the chief in his examination where the plaintiff was informed, such evidence. Due to this, the plaintiff had failed to prove that the notice of Talaat Ishid was not sent within 15 days as the other coffin required by law was not made properly, in which case both the courts There was no error in the search that matches the facts listed. Interference request revocation deleted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. CHAIRMAN, PEMRA 2011 YLR 1578
• ABDUL RAZZAQ v. State 2011 YLR 1580
• TALAT MEHMOOD v. DISTRICT REGISTRAR 2011 CLC 1582
• Ch. SHER MUHAMMAD v. Dr. MUHAMMAD QASIM GHARA 2011 MLD 1586
• MANSOOR ALI QURESHI v. S.H.O. 2011 YLR 1590
• NASARULLAH KHAN v. Mst. AQSA DURRANI 2011 CLC 1591
• IMTIAZMASIH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1593
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. FAISAL TAHIR 2011 CLD 1594

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

jobs for advocates from Nilam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes