Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD AZRAM versus MST. JAMILA BANARAS

Testimonies of Evidence Section (()) of the Muslim Family Law made by the accused under Ordinance 61, 61 under 61, no doubt proved beyond any doubt; both courts discussed each piece of evidence and Had considered every aspect of the case and rightly concluded that the accused was guilty. Both the accused courts were already very relaxed in the matter, therefore, the High Court in the jurisdiction of the review. The two courts refused to interfere in joint decisions; the review below was rejected.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MANSOOR ALI QURESHI v. S.H.O. 2011 YLR 1590
• NASARULLAH KHAN v. Mst. AQSA DURRANI 2011 CLC 1591
• IMTIAZMASIH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1593
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN v. FAISAL TAHIR 2011 CLD 1594
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM PARACHA v. State 2011 YLR 1599
• Mst. NUSRAT BIBI v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2011 YLR 1602
• Syed HASNAT AHMED BUKHARI v. BAYER PAKISTAN (PVT.) LIMITED 2011 PLC(CS) 1607
• MUHAMMAD IRFAN v. TARIQ MEHMOOD 2011 CLC 1610

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Multan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes